Comments on: Annotations in POJO – a boon or a curse? http://techtracer.com/2007/04/07/annotations-in-pojo-a-boon-or-a-curse/ Tracing the course of Web Technology Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:03:49 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: sdj http://techtracer.com/2007/04/07/annotations-in-pojo-a-boon-or-a-curse/comment-page-1/#comment-4139 sdj Fri, 02 May 2008 06:39:57 +0000 http://techtracer.com/2007/04/07/annotations-in-pojo-a-boon-or-a-curse/#comment-4139 Nitin wrote "How can one guarantee that the annotated POJO’s would be useful in another container which does not have the annotation related classes?". Can someone answer this: How can one guarantee that the injected POJO’s into the objects via Spring's IOC would be useful in another container which does not have the Spring framework related classes? Nitin wrote “How can one guarantee that the annotated POJO’s would be useful in another container which does not have the annotation related classes?”. Can someone answer this: How can one guarantee that the injected POJO’s into the objects via Spring’s IOC would be useful in another container which does not have the Spring framework related classes?

]]> By: War of POJO Application: Spring, EJB 3.0 and Guice « When IE meets SE http://techtracer.com/2007/04/07/annotations-in-pojo-a-boon-or-a-curse/comment-page-1/#comment-176 War of POJO Application: Spring, EJB 3.0 and Guice « When IE meets SE Mon, 09 Apr 2007 22:17:11 +0000 http://techtracer.com/2007/04/07/annotations-in-pojo-a-boon-or-a-curse/#comment-176 [...] 3.0 has been released on JEE 5.0. There is debate for annotation on Spring and EJB 3.0 like “Annotations in POJO - a boon or a curse?“. No doubt, Spring supports annotation [...] [...] 3.0 has been released on JEE 5.0. There is debate for annotation on Spring and EJB 3.0 like “Annotations in POJO – a boon or a curse?“. No doubt, Spring supports annotation [...]

]]> By: Chuck http://techtracer.com/2007/04/07/annotations-in-pojo-a-boon-or-a-curse/comment-page-1/#comment-170 Chuck Sun, 08 Apr 2007 16:04:06 +0000 http://techtracer.com/2007/04/07/annotations-in-pojo-a-boon-or-a-curse/#comment-170 I have had the same concerns regarding Annotations. I think that this concern could be addressed by allowing runtime modification and creation of Annotations with RUNTIME retention. Having the ability to modify or create Annotations would make it possible to use Annotations with XML configuration descriptors. I have had the same concerns regarding Annotations. I think that this concern could be addressed by allowing runtime modification and creation of Annotations with RUNTIME retention. Having the ability to modify or create Annotations would make it possible to use Annotations with XML configuration descriptors.

]]> By: John Catherino http://techtracer.com/2007/04/07/annotations-in-pojo-a-boon-or-a-curse/comment-page-1/#comment-168 John Catherino Sun, 08 Apr 2007 06:28:48 +0000 http://techtracer.com/2007/04/07/annotations-in-pojo-a-boon-or-a-curse/#comment-168 Very well put Nitin, Quite obviously, I agree completely. I would like to ask you to have a look at the cajo project. It allows remote POJOs to work together without any modification; and most importantly, it uses neither XML, nor annotations. As a result, it is exceedingly easy to use, and is also completely free. John Catherino Project Lead The cajo project https://cajo.dev.java.net Very well put Nitin,

Quite obviously, I agree completely.

I would like to ask you to have a look at the cajo project. It allows remote POJOs to work together without any modification; and most importantly, it uses neither XML, nor annotations.

As a result, it is exceedingly easy to use, and is also completely free.

John Catherino
Project Lead
The cajo project
https://cajo.dev.java.net

]]>