<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ajax Frameworks &#8211; Server side versus Client side</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techtracer.com/2007/03/27/ajax-frameworks-server-side-versus-client-side/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techtracer.com/2007/03/27/ajax-frameworks-server-side-versus-client-side/</link>
	<description>Tracing the course of Web Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 06:54:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: aaccdd</title>
		<link>http://techtracer.com/2007/03/27/ajax-frameworks-server-side-versus-client-side/comment-page-1/#comment-41291</link>
		<dc:creator>aaccdd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 08:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtracer.com/2007/03/27/ajax-frameworks-server-side-versus-client-side/#comment-41291</guid>
		<description>to produce moncler womens yourself vibrant along with appealing Let us hold on moncler outlet to determine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to produce moncler womens yourself vibrant along with appealing Let us hold on moncler outlet to determine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plagiarism - Black Listing of Sites is a Must</title>
		<link>http://techtracer.com/2007/03/27/ajax-frameworks-server-side-versus-client-side/comment-page-1/#comment-503</link>
		<dc:creator>Plagiarism - Black Listing of Sites is a Must</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 17:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtracer.com/2007/03/27/ajax-frameworks-server-side-versus-client-side/#comment-503</guid>
		<description>[...] his new site. After a few days of the promotion comment I received a trackback which was to my post AJAX Frameworks - Server side versus Client side. I was aghast with anger. The most irritating aspect of Ajaxlines was that it ripped off the entire [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] his new site. After a few days of the promotion comment I received a trackback which was to my post AJAX Frameworks &#8211; Server side versus Client side. I was aghast with anger. The most irritating aspect of Ajaxlines was that it ripped off the entire [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy Peled</title>
		<link>http://techtracer.com/2007/03/27/ajax-frameworks-server-side-versus-client-side/comment-page-1/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy Peled</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 05:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtracer.com/2007/03/27/ajax-frameworks-server-side-versus-client-side/#comment-233</guid>
		<description>It is a common mistake to consider GWT as a server side framework. GWT in run-time is a fully client side framework. It is true that you use Java to write the application but that does not make it a server based framework. ASP.NET 2.0 AJAX is partially server based as it allows in runtime to manipulate the client layer from the server. Visual WebGui which I am the project leader is server based as it fully lets you control the client from the server code. The greatest advantage of server based frameworks is security and productivity as you have one layer that is secured on the server, kind of like good old ASP.NET or JSP. In terms of security GWT surly can not be called a server framework as it exposes all your application logic in the client and executes it there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a common mistake to consider GWT as a server side framework. GWT in run-time is a fully client side framework. It is true that you use Java to write the application but that does not make it a server based framework. ASP.NET 2.0 AJAX is partially server based as it allows in runtime to manipulate the client layer from the server. Visual WebGui which I am the project leader is server based as it fully lets you control the client from the server code. The greatest advantage of server based frameworks is security and productivity as you have one layer that is secured on the server, kind of like good old ASP.NET or JSP. In terms of security GWT surly can not be called a server framework as it exposes all your application logic in the client and executes it there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Abramsy</title>
		<link>http://techtracer.com/2007/03/27/ajax-frameworks-server-side-versus-client-side/comment-page-1/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Abramsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 20:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtracer.com/2007/03/27/ajax-frameworks-server-side-versus-client-side/#comment-146</guid>
		<description>Check out this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ajaxdiff.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.ajaxdiff.com&lt;/a&gt; site which is a new community platform for comparing AJAX frameworks. It is completely open for community contributions allowing adding and updating framework details and indexing related publications. The platform was aired today with initial content and is waiting for you guys to start pumping information to it.

I will be happy to receive feedbacks. The site is built upon a dedicated framework that will be updated with your ideas.

Thanks,
Joe Abrams</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out this <a href="http://www.ajaxdiff.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ajaxdiff.com</a> site which is a new community platform for comparing AJAX frameworks. It is completely open for community contributions allowing adding and updating framework details and indexing related publications. The platform was aired today with initial content and is waiting for you guys to start pumping information to it.</p>
<p>I will be happy to receive feedbacks. The site is built upon a dedicated framework that will be updated with your ideas.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Joe Abrams</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nitinpai</title>
		<link>http://techtracer.com/2007/03/27/ajax-frameworks-server-side-versus-client-side/comment-page-1/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>nitinpai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 08:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtracer.com/2007/03/27/ajax-frameworks-server-side-versus-client-side/#comment-102</guid>
		<description>Thanks Thomas for the info !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Thomas for the info !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Hansen</title>
		<link>http://techtracer.com/2007/03/27/ajax-frameworks-server-side-versus-client-side/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techtracer.com/2007/03/27/ajax-frameworks-server-side-versus-client-side/#comment-73</guid>
		<description>Server side frameworks is often called Hijax btw...

.t</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Server side frameworks is often called Hijax btw&#8230;</p>
<p>.t</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

